Forged in Fire, Not in Drama

 Representative image

In the endless ocean of Indian reality TV, it's easy to feel drowned. Once upon a time, we had singing and dancing contests that celebrated talent. Then came the shift: drama, fights, scripted melodrama, and contestants more focused on abusing each other or chasing viral moments than showcasing actual skill. Promos alone were enough to make me switch off, endless shouting, fake tears, cheap PR stunts.

Thankfully, I disengaged early. A glance at the promos was enough. When a show starts advertising conflict instead of competence, I know it’s not meant for me.

That's when I turned to international channels, particularly the History Channel. Shows like Pawn Stars, Kings of Restoration, and Counting Cars were fun distractions, honest glimpses into passion-driven work. But nothing hooked me like Forged in Fire. Here was a competition built purely on craftsmanship, with a subtle connection to my own field of study and work: engineering, materials, precision, and the physics of tools. Blades aren't just weapons; they're engineering marvels under extreme stress.

The format is refreshingly simple: Four blacksmiths enter, three leave, one wins. Contestants forge blades (knives, axes, swords) under time pressure, then the judges: master bladesmiths test them ruthlessly: sharpness, durability, edge retention, balance. The blades either hold up or fail spectacularly. Drama? Minimal. No manufactured fights, no personal attacks, no forced tears. The tension comes from the forge itself, the heat, the hammer strikes, the risk of ruining hours of work in seconds. It's high on skill demonstration and low on manufactured conflict. For once, the spotlight stays on expertise.

What truly elevates the show for me is the final challenge: recreating a historical weapon. As a history buff, this is pure dopamine. Seeing contestants tackle Viking axes, Roman gladii, Japanese katanas, or more thrilling for me, the Indian blades like the Kataar, Vajramushti, Khanda, Khukri and many more gives me goosebumps. The judges explain the historical context, the metallurgy, the cultural significance. It reminds us that these weren't just tools of war; they were symbols of craftsmanship, defense, and identity.

On one hand, pride seeing our martial heritage acknowledged on a global platform. On the other, sadness. Watching modern contestants revive techniques our ancestors mastered centuries ago makes me sad. India has an incredible legacy of blade smithing, Wootz steel (the original Damascus), the flexible talwars that bent without breaking, the intricate Katars. These weapons helped defend kingdoms and cultures. But we've largely forgotten them. Today, they're museum pieces or props in films, not living skills. We have outsourced our own history to footnotes while foreign shows remind us of what our ancestors mastered with bare hands, fire, and instinct. Forged in Fire quietly honors that heritage in a way Indian media rarely does.

Indian TV has copied countless international formats; singing, dancing, survival, cooking but somehow, skill-focused shows like this remain absent from our mainstream. Instead, we're flooded with more nonsense: shouting matches, staged rivalries, and "reality" that's anything but real. Why not adapt something like Forged in Fire? A desi version could feature traditional weapons (talwar vs. khanda challenges), local blacksmiths from villages and rural India gets to show their skills in blade smithing, giving much needed push that skills are supreme not drama. It could revive dying crafts while entertaining without degrading anyone.

As for when India might get mature, logical, skill-focused content like this on mainstream TV? Honestly, not soon. Our channels prioritize TRPs through sensationalism, and audiences (sadly) reward it. We've seen thoughtful shows like Panchayat or skill-ish formats on international channels here. In coming 5–10 years, as younger viewers demand substance and OTT budgets grow, we might see Indian adaptations of craft-based competitions.

When that shift happens, formats like Forged in Fire won’t feel “niche” anymore, they’ll feel overdue. Until then, some of us will keep searching quietly, away from the noise for stories forged not in drama, but in skill.

What about you? Have you watched Forged in Fire? Which historical blade challenge was your favorite?

Do remember, 'When skill disappears from our screens, it eventually disappears from our society.'

Drop your thoughts below!

Are we too slow for the Universe?

When I’m sitting alone at night, looking at the sky, a familiar thought returns.

Those distant stars… those other worlds;
are we ever really going to get a closer look at them?

They feel impossibly far. Too far for a human lifetime. Too far to reach. And yet, almost immediately, another question follows me just as strongly:

Are they truly that far?
Or is that distance only a limitation of how we live and move, rather than a fixed property of the universe itself?

Physics gives a surprisingly calm answer.

It says that if someone could travel very close to the speed of light, time would slow down for them. Distance would shrink. A journey that takes thousands of years from Earth’s point of view could pass quietly almost without being felt by the traveler.

The universe doesn’t rearrange itself.
Only the experience of it does.

That idea stays with me.

It suggests that “far” and “near” might not belong to the universe at all; but to our current way of existing inside it.

If speed alone can change how time and distance behave, then how many other limits do we accept simply because we’ve never lived differently?

What if some things feel unreachable not because they are distant, but because we are slow?
What if the universe isn’t closed, just scaled beyond the way we experience it today?

While thinking about this, a line from the Isha Upanishad surfaced again in my mind:

तदेजति तन्नैजति
तद्दूरे तद्वन्तिके

“It moves, yet it moves not.
It is far, yet it is near.”

As if someone long ago noticed that reality doesn’t behave the way it appears at first glance, that distance and closeness, motion and stillness, can exist together depending on how you stand within the whole.

Modern physics tells us space and time depend on the observer. Ancient thought hints that reality itself may be layered, and that what we experience is only a fragment.

Maybe other dimensions are not hidden.
Maybe they’re simply unreachable to the way we currently live and move.

Like standing at a window and mistaking the view for the entire sky.

Even Adi Shankaracharya stated:

ब्रह्म सत्यं जगन्मिथ्या
जीवो ब्रह्मैव नापरः

“Brahma alone is real.
The world is an appearance.
The individual self is not different from Brahma.”

I may never travel near the speed of light.
I may never experience another dimension.

But knowing that distance can shrink and time can bend changes how I look at the universe and at myself.

It makes reality feel less rigid, less final.
More subtle. More negotiable.

Maybe the universe isn’t impossibly far, maybe we’re just moving through it very slowly.

What about you? When you look up at the stars, do they feel distant… or just waiting? Share your thoughts in the comments below.